Proposal for Classifying the Emetogenicity of Oral Anticancer Agents with a Focus on PARP Inhibitors: A Prospective, Observational, Multicenter Study (JASCC-CINV 2002).

Background: Olaparib and niraparib (poly adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose polymerase [PARP] inhibitors) have significant antitumor action in patients with ovarian cancer. However, the incidence of nausea and vomiting among patients on these drugs in clinical trials is rather high. There are no guidelines on antiemetic treatment for nausea caused by oral anticancer agents. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of nausea and vomiting caused by PARP inhibitors and the actual situation of antiemetic therapy in patients with gynecologic cancer. Methods: Patients with gynecologic cancer who were scheduled to receive PARP inhibitors were enrolled. Data on PARP inhibitor-induced nausea and vomiting were collected from patient diaries for 21 days. The primary endpoint was the incidence of vomiting during the 21 days after starting olaparib and niraparib. Results: Overall, between January 2020 and March 2023, 134 patients were enrolled. Of the 129 patients who were evaluated, 28 (21.7%) received prophylactic antiemetics for 21 days, and 101 (78.3%) did not. The overall incidence of PARP inhibitor-induced vomiting was 16.3%. The incidence of vomiting in the group that did not receive antiemetic prophylaxis was 13.9%. On dividing the group that did not receive antiemetic prophylaxis into the olaparib and niraparib subgroups, the incidence of vomiting was found to be 18.6% for the olaparib group and 10.3% for the niraparib group. Conclusion: The incidence of emesis without antiemetic prophylaxis among patients on olaparib and niraparib ranged from 10% to 30%. Therefore, olaparib and niraparib can be classified in the low emetogenic risk and prophylactic antiemetic therapy at the time of treatment initiation may be unnecessary.

Assessing floor contamination by antineoplastic agents in a Japanese medical institution specializing in cancer treatment.

INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the extent of contamination with antineoplastic agents on floor surfaces of the ward and the outpatient chemotherapy center of a Japanese cancer center to evaluate healthcare workers' risk of occupational exposure to antineoplastic agents outside of the designated drug preparation areas. METHODS: In this study conducted at Aichi Cancer Center, the amount of fluorouracil detected on various floor surfaces was measured using liquid chromatography-tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry. Areas around the toilets were cleaned with a surfactant two or three times a day, whereas other floor surfaces were cleaned only with dry and wet mops. RESULTS: Fluorouracil was detected on all surveyed floor surfaces, with particularly high amounts detected around the toilet areas in the ward. Additionally, areas with more human traffic tended to have higher fluorouracil contamination. CONCLUSIONS: This survey suggested that antineoplastic agent contamination occurring through patient excretions might spread throughout the hospital with human traffic. Therefore, controlling the spread of antineoplastic agent contamination in hospitals should include the review of measures to mitigate contamination around toilets and to implement effective cleaning methods for floor surfaces.

Effects of ABCB1 and ABCG2 Polymorphisms on the Pharmacokinetics of Abemaciclib Metabolites (M2, M20, M18).

BACKGROUND/AIM: Abemaciclib, an oral anticancer drug used in the treatment of breast cancer, is metabolised to its active forms - M2, M20 and M18; these forms have a potency similar to that of the parent drug. Abemaciclib and its active metabolites are reportedly transported by P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP). We previously reported that the ABCB1 2677G>T/A homozygous type is associated with a higher abemaciclib concentration leading to treatment withdrawal and/or dose reduction. However, the pharmacokinetics of its metabolites have not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of ABCB1 and ABCG2 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of the abemaciclib metabolites M2, M20 and M18. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 40 patients with breast cancer who received 150 mg abemaciclib twice per day for 2 weeks at the Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Japan. Peak areas (arbitrary unit) of abemaciclib metabolites were measured using liquid chromatography tandem with mass spectrometry and compared between ABCB1 1236T>C, 2677G>T/A, 3435C>T and ABCG2 421C>A gene polymorphisms. RESULTS: For ABCB1 2677G>T/A polymorphisms, exposure doses for the abemaciclib metabolites M2 and M20 were higher in the homozygous (TT + AT) group than in the wild-type and heterozygous (GG + GA + GT) groups (p=0.09 and p=0.06, respectively). No significant association was observed between abemaciclib metabolites and ABCB1 1236T>C, ABCB1 3435C>T and ABCG2 421C>A polymorphisms. CONCLUSION: The ABCB1 2677G>T/A polymorphism may influence tolerance to abemaciclib in breast cancer patients by affecting the pharmacokinetics of the agent and its active metabolites.

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia as a prognostic factor in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is a dose-limiting factor for cytotoxic chemotherapy, but recently, it was suggested that CIN contributes to prolonged survival. In this study, we examined the association between severe CIN and survival and determined whether CIN affected survival in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). METHODS: The medical records from 214 patients with ES-SCLC treated with etoposide or irinotecan in combination with cisplatin (EP/IP) between 2012 and 2016 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Landmark analysis was performed at the end of cycle 4, and the relationship between severe CIN and survival was determined by a log-rank test. In addition, a multivariate analysis using the COX proportional hazard model was performed to identify independent predictive factors. The Landmark analysis included 102 patients in the IP group and 47 patients in the EP group. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between grades 0-3 and grade 4 neutropenia and overall survival (OS) in the EP group (P = 0.57). Contrariwise, for the IP patients, the median OS was 444 days for grades 0-3 and 633 days for grade 4 neutropenia, which was significantly longer for patients who developed grade 4 neutropenia (P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis adjusted for potential factors revealed that the development of grade 4 CIN was identified as a significant predictor of longer OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.28-0.87, P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: The results indicated that the development of severe CIN with IP therapy is associated with prolonged OS.

Effects of ABCB1 and ABCG2 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of abemaciclib.

PURPOSE: Adverse events after the use of the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib are dose-dependent. However, its pharmacokinetics varies among individuals. Abemaciclib is reportedly transported by P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein. Therefore, we evaluated whether ABCB1 and ABCG2 polymorphisms are pharmacokinetic predictive factors of abemaciclib. METHODS: A total of 45 patients with breast cancer taking abemaciclib (150 mg twice per day) for 2 weeks were evaluated to determine the associations among abemaciclib concentration; adverse events; and ABCB1 1236 T > C, 2677G > T/A, 3435C > T, and ABCG2 421C > A gene polymorphisms. RESULTS: The trough concentration of abemaciclib was significantly higher in the group with grade 2 or greater neutropenia and thrombocytopenia than in those with grades 0 or 1. For ABCB1 2677G > T/A polymorphisms, the concentration of abemaciclib tended to be higher in the homozygous group (TT + AT) than in the wild-type + heterozygous group (GG + GA + GT) (median [range], 222.8 [80.5-295.8] ng/mL vs. 113.5 [23.6-355.2] ng/mL, P = 0.09), Moreover, the ABCB1 2677G > T/A homozygous group had a higher tendency of abemaciclib withdrawal or dose reduction within 4 weeks than the wild-type + heterozygous group (odds ratio, 4.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-20.7; P = 0.08). No significant association was observed among abemaciclib concentration; adverse reactions; and ABCB1 1236 T > C, 3435C > T, and ABCG2 421C > A polymorphisms. CONCLUSION: ABCB1 2677G > T/A polymorphism might be a predictor of the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of abemaciclib.

Effects of 5-mg dose of olanzapine for breakthrough nausea and vomiting in patients receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy: a prospective trial.

BACKGROUND: Olanzapine 10 mg is recommended for breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. However, there is a possibility that 5 mg can be expected to be sufficiently effective. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of olanzapine 5 mg for breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. METHODS: A single-arm prospective trial of olanzapine 5 mg every 24 h for 72 h was conducted to treat breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving carboplatinbased chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was total control (i.e., no emesis, no nausea, and no rescue medications) over 72 h. The secondary endpoints were early efficacy using the nausea scores at 30, 60, and 120 min after taking olanzapine from baseline and adverse events. RESULTS: Among 84 potentially eligible patients, 19 patients who took olanzapine for breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting were examined. The total control rate was 32% (95% CI: 13- 57%), 65% (95% CI: 38-89%), 65% (95% CI: 38-89%), and 29% (95% CI: 10-56%) during 2-24, 24-48, 48-72 h, and overall period, respectively. The nausea scale significantly reduced after 30 min (P=0.0078), and the scale had been reduced by 67% from the baseline after 60 min. The adverse event of somnolence of any grade was observed in 13 (68%) patients, 6 (32%) of whom had grade 2 and 1 (5%) grade 3 somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine 5 mg did not show the expected effect on the complete disappearance of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting within 24 h.

Serum concentration of the CKD4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib, but not of creatinine, strongly predicts hematological adverse events in patients with breast cancer: a preliminary report.

Purpose The CKD4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib is related to adverse events such as hematological toxicity and increase in serum creatinine levels associated with abemaciclib pharmacokinetics. Increase in serum creatinine levels is considered a result of competition with abemaciclib via organic cation transporter 2 and multidrug and toxic compound extrusion. Therefore, we evaluated the association among serum creatinine levels, serum abemaciclib concentrations, and adverse events and whether increase in serum creatinine levels is a useful indicator for predicting the onset of the adverse events of abemaciclib. Methods In total, the data of 12 patients with breast cancer who were treated with abemaciclib (150 mg twice daily) were evaluated to determine the association between increased serum creatinine levels and abemaciclib concentrations and hematological toxicity. Results Grade 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia were observed at 4 weeks in four (33%), two (17%), and one (8%) patients, respectively. A significant association was observed between steady-state abemaciclib concentrations and the rate of decrease in neutrophil and platelet counts (r = - 0.80, P = 0.003 and r = - 0.70, P = 0.016, respectively). Compared with baseline levels (0.61 [0.53-0.82] mg/mL), serum creatinine levels significantly increased and reached a steady state in at least 2 weeks (0.84 [0.61-1.02] mg/mL, P = 0.01). However, we did not find a significant association between increase in serum creatinine levels and abemaciclib concentrations and hematological toxicity. Conclusions Abemaciclib concentrations are associated with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. However, increase in serum creatinine levels may not be a useful predictor for estimating abemaciclib pharmacokinetics and hematological toxicity.

Associations among regorafenib concentrations, severe adverse reactions, and ABCG2 and OATP1B1 polymorphisms.

PURPOSE: The ability of predicting severe adverse reactions caused by regorafenib is important. We evaluated regorafenib concentrations for adverse reaction risks and assessed the relevance of laboratory values and gene polymorphisms. METHODS: A total of 28 Japanese cancer patients who were treated with regorafenib were evaluated for the steady state of serum regorafenib concentrations and adverse reactions for 28 days. In addition, we determined the association of regorafenib concentrations with ABCG2 and OATP1B1 polymorphisms, which are regorafenib transporters. RESULTS: Regorafenib concentrations were significantly higher in the group with Grade 2 or higher total bilirubin elevation and thrombocytopenia compared with the group with grades 0 or 1 [3.45 (2.18-7.31) vs. 1.76 (0.26-2.77) µg/mL, P = 0.01 and 3.45 (2.12-7.31) vs. 1.76 (0.26-2.77) µg/mL, P = 0.02, respectively]. A strong association was noted between serum regorafenib concentrations and total bilirubin levels, but the physical and genetic factors predicting regorafenib pharmacokinetics could not be clarified. CONCLUSIONS: Regorafenib concentrations were associated with total bilirubin elevation and thrombocytopenia. Total serum bilirubin could be a useful marker when estimating regorafenib pharmacokinetics.

Differences in Urinary Renal Failure Biomarkers in Cancer Patients Initially Treated with Cisplatin.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We investigated whether measuring the excretion of each acute kidney injury (AKI) biomarker after cisplatin (CDDP) administration is useful for predicting AKI and evaluated the most appropriate AKI marker in patients treated with CDDP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We measured NAG, Kim-1, and NGAL in urinary samples of 40 cancer patients treated with chemotherapy on day 1 (before chemotherapy), day 2, and day 5 after treatment; serum creatinine (sCr) was compared on days 7 and 28 after CDDP administration vs. baseline. RESULTS: NAG, Kim-1, and NGAL excretion (creatinine corrected) were not significantly elevated 5 days after receiving chemotherapy in the non-CDDP chemotherapy group. Conversely, all markers were significantly higher 5 days after receiving chemotherapy in the CDDP group when compared to baseline. CONCLUSION: Urinary NAG, Kim-1, and NGAL can detect renal injury more sensitively than sCr.

Association between ABCG2 and SLCO1B1 polymorphisms and adverse drug reactions to regorafenib: a preliminary study
.

OBJECTIVE: Due to the occurrence of severe adverse drug reactions to regorafenib, a drug used in cancer therapy, the identification of a predictive marker(s) is needed to increase the therapeutic applicability of this compound. We therefore investigated whether polymorphisms in the ABCG2 and SLCO1B genes are associated with adverse drug reactions to regorafenib. METHODS: For these analyses, 37 Japanese cancer patients were treated with regorafenib, genotyped for polymorphisms in ABCG2 and SLCO1B, and evaluated for drug-related adverse drug reactions. RESULTS: There was no association between the ABCG2 421C>A variant and adverse drug reactions to regorafenib. After treatment, the incidences of increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) as well as increased total bilirubin (grade ≥ 2) were 8%, 4%, and 12%, and 42%, 25%, and 25% among SLCO1B1*1b carriers and non-carriers, respectively. There were no significant associations between elevated ALT and bilirubin and the SLCO1B1*1b allele. However, there were significantly lower incidences of increased AST (8% vs. 42%) and anemia (16% vs. 50%) in SLCO1B1*1b carriers than in non-carriers. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of SLCO1B1*1b allele appears to be associated with the development of adverse drug reactions to regorafenib; however, further studies involving larger test groups and other populations are needed to confirm these findings.
.

Dialyzability of Faropenem in Infected Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the profile of dialyzability of an oral penem antibiotic, faropenem (FRPM), in hemodialysis (HD) patients with infections. Eight patients took one tablet of FRPM (200 mg) every 12 h during an inter-dialysis period, and another tablet at 1-5 h before the beginning of the HD session. Blood samples were obtained during the HD session (3-4 h). Plasma FRPM concentrations in the arterial side were 4.8 ± 2.5 and 2.8 ± 1.0 µg/mL before and at the end of HD session, respectively, which are above the 50% minimal inhibitory concentrations of FRPM against the major pathogen (0.015-2 µg/mL). Dialyzer clearance and elimination fraction of FRPM were 14.9 ± 6.8 mL/min per m2 and 20.4 ± 9.9%, respectively. About 2% of FRPM was removed from the body during a single HD session. The infection-related symptoms, the white blood cell count and the level of C-reactive protein were improved by FRPM without any adverse effects. These data suggest that the dialyzability of FRPM is relatively low, and the amount of the drug removed by a single HD session is small. FRPM 200 mg twice daily might provide an effective and safe dosage regimen without additional dosing at the end of the HD session.

A phase II trial of prophylactic olanzapine combined with palonosetron and dexamethasone for preventing nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin.

AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of olanzapine in combination with palonosetron and dexamethasone for patients receiving cisplatin (≥50 mg/m(2) ), because this antiemetic therapy has not been sufficiently examined in patients receiving cisplatin. METHODS: We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of olanzapine in combination with palonosetron and dexamethasone for chemotherapy naïve patients receiving cisplatin (≥50 mg/m(2) ). Patients received prophylactic dexamethasone (20 mg IV, day 1), palonosetron (0.75 mg IV, day 1), and olanzapine (10 mg, days 1-4). The patients were monitored for emesis and nausea for 120 h after chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate, which was defined as no vomiting episodes and no use of rescue medication for the overall period. CR rates of 65% and 45% would indicate the potential usefulness and the lower limit of interest, respectively. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients, including 37 esophageal cancer patients were enrolled, of whom 41 (80%) completed the treatment protocol as planned. The complete response rate for the overall period was 43% (95% confidence interval: 29-58); the primary endpoint was not met. Vomiting was frequently observed, with the overall rate of 51%. Most events occurred during 24-72 h after chemotherapy. Somnolence was observed in 73% of the patients, but it was well tolerated in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine combined with palonosetron and dexamethasone did not prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin as expected. The safety of this antiemetic therapy was confirmed.

Drug interaction between celecoxib and methotrexate in organic anion transporter 3-transfected renal cells and in rats in vivo.

Methotrexate has a clinically important pharmacokinetic interaction with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) mainly through its competition for tubular secretion via the renal organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3). We have previously reported the usefulness of OAT3-transfected renal tubular cells for screening of the drugs which interfere with the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate. Celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase (COX) 2 inhibitor, has not been reported to interact with methotrexate, but the mechanisms are unclear why the interaction did not occur. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of celecoxib on methotrexate tubular secretion using a renal cell line stably expressing human OAT3 (S2-hOAT3), and to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction of the two drugs in rats. [3H]methotrexate uptake into S2-hOAT3 cells was significantly inhibited by celecoxib in a concentration-dependent manner and the Ki value was 35.3 microM. However, methotrexate serum concentrations and urinary excretion of methotrexate over 24 h in rats were not affected by celecoxib (50, 200 mg/kg). Celecoxib serum concentrations were increased by the increase in celecoxib dosage and the maximum drug concentration (Cmax) was 20.6 microM (celecoxib 200 mg/kg), which did not reach the Ki value obtained in the in vitro study. These results indicated that celecoxib inhibited the secretion of methotrexate via hOAT3, which suggested that celecoxib was a substrate of hOAT3. However, co-administration of the two drugs at clinical dosage did not affect the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate, because the serum concentrations did not reach the Ki value. Although the accumulation study using S2-hOAT3 cells was useful to predict the interaction between the new drug and methotrexate in vivo, a comparison of the Ki value with the Cmax in clinical dosage was necessary to evaluate the degree of this interaction.

Evaluation of the interaction between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and methotrexate using human organic anion transporter 3-transfected cells.

Coadministration of methotrexate and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can cause a pharmacokinetic interaction and a subsequent increase in blood methotrexate concentrations. methotrexate and most NSAIDs are excreted into urine via organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3). The purpose of this study was to evaluate NSAIDs that compete less with methotrexate by using the renal cell line stably expressing human OAT3 (S2-hOAT3) in vitro. We also confirmed the pharmacokinetic interaction of methotrexate with NSAIDs in vivo. [(3)H]methotrexate uptake into S2-hOAT3 cells was inhibited by most NSAIDs in a concentration-dependent manner, but aspirin, salicylate, tiaramide, and acetaminophen did not inhibit uptake. Inhibition by sulindac and pranoprofen was weaker at therapeutic drug concentrations. Furthermore, methotrexate concentrations in rat serum were significantly increased in a NSAID concentration-dependent manner when concentrations of coadministered NSAIDs increased above the Ki values obtained in the in vitro study. On the other hand, drugs that were not substrates of hOAT3, such as acetaminophen, did not interact with methotrexate. The magnitude of the pharmacokinetic interaction between methotrexate and NSAIDs was significantly correlated with results of the accumulation study in vitro and was not significantly correlated with a reduction of urinary creatinine excretion. In conclusion, methotrexate and most NSAIDs are substrates of hOAT3, and those drugs compete via hOAT3 in tubular secretion, the major mechanism of the interaction between methotrexate and NSAIDs. The accumulation study using S2-hOAT3 cells might be useful for screening of potential interactions between methotrexate and new NSAIDs in vivo.

Dosing time-dependent effect of raloxifene on plasma fibrinogen concentration in ovariectomized rats.

The chronopharmacological effect of raloxifene, a selective estrogen-receptor modulator, was evaluated by repeated dosing of ovariectomized rats. Bilateral ovariectomy or sham operation was performed at age 12 wks, and animals were kept in rooms with a 12 h light-12 h dark cycle. Raloxifene (3 mg/kg, once daily for 10 wks) or vehicle was given repeatedly at either 2 h after lights-on (2 HALO) or 14 h after lights-on (14 HALO). Plasma fibrinogen concentration at the end of the study was reduced by the drug, and the reduction was significantly prominent in rats in whom the drug was dosed at 2 HALO rather than 14 HALO. Femur bone density decreased, and urinary excretion of deoxypyridinoline, an index of bone resorption capacity of osteoclasts, increased in ovariectomized animals at the end of the study. Treatment with raloxifene ameliorated these changes in a dosing time-independent manner. Serum calcium, ALT, and total protein concentrations at the end of the study also did not differ according to treatment regime, which indicates that protein synthesis and liver function may not contribute to the effects. This is the first study to determine dosing time-dependent changes in the efficacy of raloxifene in an animal model of osteoporosis. Because fibrinogen concentration is reported to be a marker of cardiovascular events, consideration of dosing time of raloxifene may be important to obtain a better cardioprotective effect of this medication when it is prescribed to postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Dosing time-dependent variation of bone resorption by cyclosporin A in rats' femurs.

The dosing time-dependent difference of bone resorption by cyclosporin A was determined in normal rats. Rats were kept in rooms with a 12-h light/dark cycle. Cyclosporin A (3 mg/kg, once a day) or vehicle was given at either 2 h after light on (2 HALO) or 8 HALO, 14 HALO, 20 HALO for 24 weeks. Serum and 4-h urine samples were obtained before and at 12 and 24 weeks after the treatment. Body weight, creatinine clearance, serum parathyroid hormone, the trough level of cyclosporin A in whole blood and urinary excretion of Ca and P were not changed by the drug at every any dosing time. Serum Ca and P concentrations by the vehicle treatment differed with the dosing time. Furthermore, increases of these two parameters by the drug varied with dosing time; most prominently at the 2 HALO dosing, and were not seen at the 8 and 14 HALO dosings. Degree of bone resorption of the femur determined by dual-energy X-ray absorption, also varied with dosing time, most prominently at 2 HALO and less prominently at 14 HALO. Increase of urine deoxypyridinoline excretion, a marker of osteoclast activity, by the drug was highest at 2 HALO and lowest at 14 HALO, however parathyroid hormone and osteocalcin concentrations after cyclosporin A treatment did not vary with dosing time. Reduction of urinary nitric oxide (NO) was most prominent at 2 HALO and negligible at 14 HALO. We concluded that cyclosporin A-induced bone resorption and serum Ca and P increases were varied with dosing time. Sensitivity of osteoclasts by the drug was the major mechanisms of the phenomenon, while differences in pharmacokinetics, the parathyroid gland, osteoblasts and renal handling of Ca and P did not contribute to the phenomenon.